PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Every submitted manuscript is assigned a unique paper ID. The papers first undergo an initial screening to ensure they fit the conference scope and meet the required standards of format, plagiarism, and originality. After this, each manuscript is sent for a technical peer review. The corresponding author is informed about the review outcome.
AIIS’26 follows a strict double-blind peer review system to maintain fairness and quality. If the reviewers suggest changes, the manuscript is returned to the authors for revision and must be submitted again within the given time. The final decision on acceptance is announced after the third level of evaluation by the conference committee.

Review Process

1. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial check for scope, formatting, and plagiarism by the Technical Review Committee.
2. Each paper is evaluated by two or more expert reviewers from the relevant research area.
3. Reviewers are selected based on their academic and research expertise.
4. To maintain impartiality, reviewers are independent and not affiliated with the host institute.
5. The conference follows a double-blind review system, ensuring anonymity of both authors and reviewers.
6. Reviewers assess papers based on originality, technical depth, methodology, analysis, clarity, and relevance to the conference theme.
7. After the first review, authors receive comments and suggestions for necessary improvements.
8. Authors must submit a revised version addressing all reviewer comments within the given deadline.
9. The revised paper is re-evaluated by the same reviewers to verify the quality of improvements.
10. Additional revisions may be requested until reviewers are fully satisfied.
11. Once reviewers give positive recommendations, the Technical Review Committee finalizes the acceptance.
12. Accepted papers are notified to authors for camera-ready submission and inclusion in the conference proceedings.
13. The entire review workflow ensures fairness, transparency, originality, and high academic quality.